Pop singer Gloria Estefan, a prominent Florida Republican involved in a variety of businesses, helped to organize the Miami March for "human Rights" in support of the Ladies in White, a group of Cuban dissidents supported and abetted by the State Department. The Miami rally was echoed in New York, Los Angeles, and Madrid. In L.A., Andy Garcia, George Lopez and others spoke at a rally denouncing Cuba. It's easy for the winners in the American sweepstakes, these pampered celebrities, a chosen few, to trumpet their faith in the American dream.
The State Department echoed by the EU has once again raised the human rights issue to beat up Cuba. In 1959, Fidel Castro declared his independence from the United States - possibly without realizing that punishment could last 51+ years. Even when US national interests are involved, Washington acts petulantly if not downright childishly.
Following last month's session with Cuba's diplomats re Cuban immigration quotas, narco-trafficking and other mutual interests -- Bush canceled all talks in 2002 - the US Interest Section sent its vehicles to fetch "dissidents" to a party. The Cuban government responded with barely concealed anger. US diplomats behaved as progress toward dealing with joint concerns merits a US poke in Cuba's eye: celebrating with people who announced unending opposition to Cuba's government and received US perks and privileges as a result.
For example, the Interest Section supplies dissidents with a variety of "needs," such as cell phones and lap tops which, "dissidents" claim, get confiscated by Cuban State Security. "We have photographs of them selling these items," a Cuban official told me. "When the "dissident" reports the loss, the Interest Section, meaning US taxpayers - although few know it - supply them with new ones."
Did the State Department think of possible consequences of the Interest Section's little joke? Suppose Raul Castro acted in as mean-spirited a way as State's tough-guy image of him. He would announce to Cuba's considerable unemployed population that those who wanted to seek work elsewhere could do so without repercussion. Now, imagine waves of rafters landing in south Florida with its high unemployment rate!
Cuban security agents could arrest and try a group of the Interest Section's favorite "dissidents" In the ensuing trial, witnesses against them would come from State Security. The Interest Section had known them as other favored "dissidents." ("They're giving our taxpayers' money to Cuban State Security Agents? An angry Senator might ask.) In 2003, Cuba arrested 75 "dissidents," twelve witnesses testified the accused took money, goods and services from US diplomats all undercover moles disguised as "dissidents.
Memory seems absent when the issue is punishing Cuba. In 2006, a former Interest Section official waxed eloquent about Cuba's human rights violations, as if the US record was immaculate. Under Eisenhower and Kennedy, when Washington first bellowed its "democratic" principles, millions of black Americans could not vote, chain gangs flourished at state prisons, and lynchings periodically took place.
Fidel Castro, the Kennedy crowd righteously sneered, refused to hold elections. Some cynics thought Kennedy and his bootlegger father had padded Illinois' ballot boxes where JFK narrowly defeated Nixon. Cuba's electoral system may have flaws, but its Supreme Court didn't declare counting votes unessential to democracy. (See Gore v. Bush.)
As Washington hurled its "principled" criticisms at Havana consistently over decades, it simultaneously financed thousands of terrorist attacks and assassinations against Cuba and its leaders. Killing people did not violate human rights?
In 2010, Washington continues to taunt Havana - currently for failing to rescue a "political prisoner," Orlando Zapata Tamayo, who died during a hunger strike. Zapata, arrested on assault charges, decided in prison to convert to dissidence. Videos show Cuban authorities hospitalized. No one asked for his insurance policy. The video shows him receiving top-level medical attention. A current "dissident" Guillermo Farinas then launched his hunger strike at his home until Cuba released all its political prisoners. When he fainted, Cuban authorities rushed him to the hospital.
Prisoner abuse should become a US human rights scandal. A Chinese account on US Human Rights cites "a report presented to the 10th meeting of the Human Rights Council of the United Nations in 2009 by its Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms while countering Terrorism." The report showed "the United States has pursued a comprehensive set of practices including special deportation, long-term and secret detentions and acts violating the United Nations Convention against Torture. (China Daily, Marc 17, 2010)
The Chinese report, using a Department of Agriculture study, states that currently 16.7 million US "children, or one fourth of the U.S. total, had not enough food in 2008." (USA Today, November 17, 2009). A Feeding America report added that "more than 3.5 million children under the age of five face hunger or malnutrition." (www.feedingamerica.org, May 7, 2009).
Washington's real issue relates to Cuban disobedience of its policies; not human rights. In fact, Cubans enjoy substantive rights American citizens don't: food, housing, medical care, and education. Cuba falls short on procedural rights regarding press and political parties.
But when the religious police in Saudi Arabia our oily partner cane women who show skin, the State Department says "Ho Hum." Nor does Cuba's Communist rule matter - witness Vietnam and China, major commercial partners of the US.
Ronald Reagan privatized Cuba policy, leaving it with a right wing minority sector in Miami that doesn't want improvement. Each step forward such as immigration talks in February begets a step backwards, thanks to the anti-Cuba lobby's power: one hunger striker dies; another emerges to steal headlines.
Maybe things will change when Cuba's off shore oil starts spouting!
Saul Landau is an Institute for Policy Studies fellow who received Chile's Bernardo O'Higgins award for human rights. CounterPunch published his A BUSH AND BOTOX WORLD
Luis Posada Carriles and Ladies in White go out on a limb in Miami
Posada Carriles at yesterday's march in Miami (March 25, 2010).
Posada Carriles and the Ladies in White, "Friends Forever" -español
By José Pertierra
Only in Miami. Despite the seventy-three outstanding first-degree murder charges against him related to the mid-air explosion of a Cubana Airlines passenger jet, Luis Posada Carriles has not been extradited to Venezuela nor has he been indicted in the United States for these crimes. He wanders unleashed and un-vaccinated along Calle Ocho in Miami, marching alongside Gloria Estefanin support of the so-called Ladies in White.
His support of the "ladies" ought not to surprise us. There is an important link between Posada and these "ladies." The link is called Santiago Alvarez Fernández-Magriña. It's a well established fact, admitted even by the "ladies" themselves that their organization receives $1,500 a month from Rescate Jurídico[Legal Rescue] in Miami. Posada and the "ladies" share the same godfather.
The president of Rescate Jurídico is no more and no less than Santiago Alvarez Fernández-Magriña. An extremely close friend and Luis Posada Carriles' financial sponsor, Alvarez was the person who brought Posada to the United States on his boat, the Santrina, according to documents from the U.S. District Attorney's office. A few weeks later, he organized the famous and shameful press conference for Posada Carriles who had up until that point been "hidden" in Miami. Alvarez is also the same person who got one of his people to place two bombs in the Tropicana nightclub in Havana. This conversation was recorded and exposed on Cuban television.
It's evident that the terrorist history of this sinister person did not stop the "ladies" from involving themselves in this game and receiving money salted with Cuban blood. In the United States, receiving money from a terrorist organization is a felony that carries a harsh punishment. I suppose the same is true in Cuba. Nevertheless, until now, the only sanction that these "ladies" have received is repudiation from Cubans in the street. The Cuban government has shown itself to be extremely tolerant, even providing police protection.
Here's a suggestion for Posada Carriles. If he really wants to march in support of Santiago Alvarez Fernández-Magriña's "ladies," he ought to go to Havana to do it. As Calle 13 would say, "I dare you!"
Machetera is a member of Tlaxcala, the international network of translators for linguistic diversity. This translation may be reprinted as long as the content remains unaltered, and the author and translator are cited.
Categories: Cuba · Cuban Five · Terrorism · propaganda