I have been commenting somewhat privately about 'gender' issues (that what we have 'set up' is patently ridiculous and provably wrong in ever so many ways). Here's an example:
Yeah.
Now, if you examine all the photos in this set, you will note that there's a commonality there that precedes any attraction to the body of the other.
In other words, if what you want (sexually) is pain, chances are you'll prefer your non-preferred gender to one of your preferred gender who prefers gentility in the sack, no?
And if you are of a gentle nature, if offered an extremely attractive person in other respects, once the underlying requirements are exposed, the attraction simply is not there, no?
The actual situation resembles RPG categories far more than that BS, "Male and female He created them."
Of course, that's provably incorrect. Male, female, and [P/C]AIS he created them, at *least* (gotta get that whole list made up properly).
And if the G guy *forgot* to include that little fact in his 'Big Book' for us, what *else* might he have forgotten?
Per the (likely) incorrect 'Big Bangers' he's at least fifteen billion years old now.
I wouldn't think that it would be 'early onset' if it were some kind of age-induced senility.
And of course, He created *US*. That doesn't really point to a rational decision.
Best one liner on that yet:
  |
|
Leave a comment